US v. Jasper Allen
Filing
Amending order/opinion filed [998564490] amending and superseding Unpublished per curiam Opinion [998381308-3]. Motion disposition in opinion--terminating Motion to seal [998443702-2], amending opinion. Originating case number: 5:03-cr-00299-BO-1. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Jasper Tujuian Allen. [10-6319]
<![CDATA[
Case: 10-6319
Document: 23
Date Filed: 04/08/2011
Filed:
Page: 1
April 8, 2011
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 10-6319
(5:03-cr-00299-BO-1)
___________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JASPER TUJUIAN ALLEN,
Defendant – Appellant.
___________________
O R D E R
___________________
Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to amend opinion,
the Court grants the motion and amends the first sentence of the
text
to
read:
“Jasper
Tujuian
Allen
appeals
the
district
court’s order denying his motion to reopen his sentence.”
For the Court
/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
Case: 10-6319
Document: 23
Date Filed: 04/08/2011
Page: 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6319
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JASPER TUJUIAN ALLEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:03-cr-00299-BO-1)
Submitted:
June 29, 2010
Decided:
July 16, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jasper Tujuian Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Case: 10-6319
Document: 23
Date Filed: 04/08/2011
Page: 3
PER CURIAM:
Jasper
order
denying
Tujuian
his
Allen
motion
to
appeals
reopen
his
the
district
sentence.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
court’s
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United
States v. Allen, No. 5:03-cr-00299-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2010).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
