US v. Fausto Cepeda


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:93-cr-00128-JRS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998416389] [10-6320]

Download PDF
US v. Fausto Cepeda Doc. 0 Case: 10-6320 Document: 11 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6320 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FAUSTO CEPEDA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:93-cr-00128-JRS-1) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fausto Cepeda, Appellant Pro Se. Assistant United States Attorney, Appellee. David Thomas Maguire, Richmond, Virginia, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6320 Document: 11 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Fausto denying (2006), his Cepeda filed a appeals the to in district 18 court's order motion pursuant reduction U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) on the which sought sentence based amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, United Feb. 9, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. States 2010). legal before v. Cepeda, No. 3:93-cr-00128-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?