Tyrone Roberson v. South Carolina DOC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998378632-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998343034-2] Originating case number: 8:09-cv-01333-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998437839] [10-6361]
Tyrone Roberson v. South Carolina DOC
Doc. 0
Case: 10-6361 Document: 18
Date Filed: 10/04/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6361 TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON, a/k/a Tyrone L. Roberson, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; COMMISSIONER JON E. OZMINT, etc & al of Lee Correctional Inst.; SCDC OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:09-cv-01333-CMC) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Lamar Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parker McLean, CLARKE, JOHNSON, PETERSON, & MCLEAN, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-6361 Document: 18
Date Filed: 10/04/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Tyrone Lamar Roberson appeals the district court's
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (D.S.C. Roberson Feb. 24, v. South Carolina, We deny No. 8:09-cv-01333-CMC motions for
2010).
Robinson's
appointment of counsel and for a transcript. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before
We dispense with contentions the court are and
adequately
presented
materials
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?