US v. Kevin Walker
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:05-cr-00005-RBS-JEB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998416478] [10-6364]
<![CDATA[
US v. Kevin Walker
Doc. 0
Case: 10-6364 Document: 20
Date Filed: 09/01/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6364 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. KEVIN LAMONT WALKER, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00005-RBS-JEB-1) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Lamont Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-6364 Document: 20
Date Filed: 09/01/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Kevin court's order Lamont denying Walker his Fed. seeks R. to Civ. appeal P. the district for
60(b)
motion
reconsideration of that court's denial of his § 3582 motion. This Court reviews the denial of a motion for relief from MLC
judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) for an abuse of discretion.
Automotive, LLC v. Town of Southern Pines, 532 F.3d 269, 277 (4th Cir. 2008). This Court may not review the merits of the
underlying order, but instead "may only review the denial of the motion with respect to the grounds set forth in Rule 60(b)." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Having district district court court reviewed did not the abuse record, its the we conclude and that affirm the the
discretion R. 60(b)
order
denying
motion.
United
States v. Walker, No. 4:05-cr-00005-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2010). We legal before dispense with are and oral argument because in aid the the the facts and
contentions the court
adequately argument
presented not
materials decisional
would
process. AFFIRMED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
