US v. Samuel Crook

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00059-MR-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998437912] [10-6391]

Download PDF
US v. Samuel Crook Doc. 0 Case: 10-6391 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/04/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6391 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL PAUL CROOK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00059-MR-1) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6391 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/04/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court's order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm United States v. 25, facts 2010). and We legal for the reasons stated by the district court. Crook, No. 3:04-cr-00059-MR-1 oral argument (W.D.N.C. because Feb. the dispense with contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?