Emmanuel Sewell v. Kathleen Green
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
EMMANUEL EDWARD SEWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KATHLEEN GREEN; MICHAEL KING; BRIAN ROMINES; ZOCK, Sergeant; WESTBROOK, Officer; RAGINS, Officer; GARRISEY, Officer; BARNES, Lieutenant; JOHNSON, Lieutenant; WALTER HOLMES, Captain; UNIDENTIFIED BLACK OFFICER; FIVE UNKNOWN OFFICERS, Defendants - Appellees, and WARDEN, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-01027-DKC)
February 24, 2011
February 28, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emmanuel Edward Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Emmanuel Edward Sewell appeals the district court's
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 2010). Sewell v. Green, No. 8:08-cv-01027-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 16, We deny Sewell's motion to appoint counsel. * We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sewell has filed a document entitled "Motion of Issues on Appeal of the Lower Courts [sic] Judgment" that appears to be his brief on appeal. We deny the motion.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?