Samuel Jackson v. H. Poplin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [998310615-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998310613-2] Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00107-GCM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998417347] [10-6441]

Samuel Jackson v. H. Poplin

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6441 Document: 14

Date Filed: 09/02/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6441 SAMUEL R. JACKSON, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. H. POPLIN, Programmer, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; S. HOVERMALE, Kitchen Supervisor, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; SGT. R. NICHOLSON; SGT. D. LENTZ, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00107-GCM) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6441 Document: 14

Date Filed: 09/02/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mar. 12, Jackson 2010). v. We Poplin, also No. 3:10-cv-00107-GCM pending (W.D.N.C. motions to

deny

Jackson's

appoint counsel and to amend his complaint. oral argument because in the the facts and legal

We dispense with contentions the court are and

adequately

presented

materials

before

argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2