William McKinnedy, III v. Cecil Reynold

Filing

UNPUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998376429-2] Originating case number: 6:08-cv-03169-HMH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998417244] [10-6456]

William McKinnedy, III v. Cecil Reynold

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6456 Document: 15

Date Filed: 09/02/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6456 WILLIAM CLAYTON MCKINNEDY, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MRS. CECIL REYNOLDS, Warden at Kershaw Correctional Institution and et al.; MR. ROBERT E. WARD, a/k/a Bob Ward; JON OZMINT; MARK SANFORD; MIKE FAIR; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER; MS. MARY COLEMAN; MS. SANDRA BOWIE; MS. A. HARDIN; MRS. A. SELLERS; JEROME ARMSTRONG; MR. SYLVESTA ROBINSON, Investigator; JAMES WAKELEY; BECKWITH, NFN; JAMES BAYTES; ROBERT HUGGINS, a/k/a Bob Huggins; JERRY WASHINGTON; T. SMITH; MRS. PRICE, Contraband Sgt of Palmetto; SEWARD; NFN DUBOSE; PATRICIA CAUDLE, Officer at Medical; DAVID M. TATARSKY; ROBERT WESLEY JACOBS; OSCAR FAULKENBERRY; CAPTAIN THOMAS, Kershaw Correctional Institution; DANIEL J. MURPHY, Inspector General of SCDC; LINDA J. MARTIN, OPNS, Secretary General Counsel, SCDC's headquarters; DENNIS PATTERSON, SCDC General Counsel Office, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:08-cv-03169-HMH) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6456 Document: 15

Date Filed: 09/02/2010

Page: 2

William Clayton McKinnedy, III, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Case: 10-6456 Document: 15

Date Filed: 09/02/2010

Page: 3

PER CURIAM: William Clayton McKinnedy, III, appeals the district court's orders substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 We

(2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKinnedy v. Reynolds, No. 6:08-cv-03169-HMH (D.S.C.

Feb. 5, 2010).

We deny McKinnedy's motion for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

would

process. AFFIRMED

Because the case was dismissed on summary judgment, the district court did not adopt the magistrate judge's recommendation to count the dismissal as a "strike" for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006). 3