Kenneth Johnson v. J. Cannon, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:08-cv-00776-PMD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998397328] [10-6469]
Case: 10-6469
Document: 18
Date Filed: 08/06/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6469 KENNETH J. JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff; MITCH P. LUCAS, Detention Center Administrator; A. HANSON, Major at Detention Center; CAPTAIN GATHERS, at Detention Center; CAPTAIN BEATTY, at Detention Center, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (4:08-cv-00776-PMD) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth J. Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eugene P. Corrigan, III, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina; Harry V. Ragsdale, CORRIGAN & CHANDLER, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Case: 10-6469
Document: 18
Date Filed: 08/06/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Kenneth J. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Cannon, No. 4:08-cv-00776-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
15, 2010). legal before
contentions the court
would
process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?