Kenneth Johnson v. J. Cannon, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:08-cv-00776-PMD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998397328] [10-6469]

Download PDF
Case: 10-6469 Document: 18 Date Filed: 08/06/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6469 KENNETH J. JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff; MITCH P. LUCAS, Detention Center Administrator; A. HANSON, Major at Detention Center; CAPTAIN GATHERS, at Detention Center; CAPTAIN BEATTY, at Detention Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (4:08-cv-00776-PMD) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth J. Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eugene P. Corrigan, III, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina; Harry V. Ragsdale, CORRIGAN & CHANDLER, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6469 Document: 18 Date Filed: 08/06/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth J. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Cannon, No. 4:08-cv-00776-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional 15, 2010). legal before contentions the court would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?