Robert Coker v. Larry Power


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998405013-2] Originating case number: 4:09-cv-03332-HFF-TER Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998439117] [10-6520]

Download PDF
Robert Coker v. Larry Power Doc. 0 Case: 10-6520 Document: 20 Date Filed: 10/05/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6520 ROBERT COKER, Plaintiff Appellant, v. WARDEN LARRY POWERS; SPARTANBURG COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; OFFICER GREER, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (4:09-cv-03332-HFF-TER) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 5, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Coker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6520 Document: 20 Date Filed: 10/05/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Coker seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Coker's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint against one of the Defendants. over final orders, This court may exercise jurisdiction only 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). neither a final order nor The order Coker seeks to appeal is an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack We of jurisdiction and deny Coker's motion to appoint counsel. dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?