US v. Kenyatta Adam

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998417301] [10-6522]

Download PDF
US v. Kenyatta Adam Doc. 0 Case: 10-6522 Document: 11 Date Filed: 09/02/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6522 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENYATTA HASANI ADAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenyatta Hasani Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6522 Document: 11 Date Filed: 09/02/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Kenyatta order denying his Hasani motion Adams for appeals the of district sentence court's under 18 reduction U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Adams, No. 2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 24, 2010 & entered Feb. 26, 2010); see also Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 543 2693-94 220 (2010) (2005), (holding does not that United to States v. Booker, U.S. apply 3582(c)(2) proceedings). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?