US v. Charles Russell


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:98-cr-00483-DKC-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998439941] [10-6547]

Download PDF
US v. Charles Russell Doc. 0 Case: 10-6547 Document: 10 Date Filed: 10/06/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6547 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES M. RUSSELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:98-cr-00483-DKC-1) Submitted: September 16, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles M. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Gina Simms, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6547 Document: 10 Date Filed: 10/06/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Charles M. Russell appeals the district court's order denying a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the United States v. Russell, No. 8:98-cr-00483We dispense with oral argument district court. DKC-1 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2010). because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?