US v. Brooks Terrell
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. BROOKS JAMES TERRELL, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00610-HMH-1)
June 17, 2010
June 28, 2010
Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brooks James Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Brooks order denying James relief Terrell on his appeals 18 U.S.C. the district court's (2006)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the United States v. Terrell, No. 7:99-cr-00610We dispense with oral argument
HMH-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2010).
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?