US v. Richard Dixon


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:96-cr-00191-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998437174] [10-6558]

Download PDF
US v. Richard Dixon Doc. 0 Case: 10-6558 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6558 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. RICHARD L. DIXON, a/k/a E, a/k/a Earl, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:96-cr-00191-1) Submitted: September 15, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010 Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard L. Dixon, for Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6558 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Richard L. Dixon appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction, as well We as its order denying the his motion and find for no reconsideration. reversible error. orders. have reviewed record Accordingly, we affirm the district court's United States v. Dixon, No. 2:96-cr-00191-1 (S.D.W. Va. We filed June 29, 2009 & entered June 30, 2009; Mar. 16, 2010). dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?