Reginald Sweat v. Dorris Cook

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998439035-2] Originating case number: 9:09-cv-01255-HFF Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998474266] [10-6595]

Reginald Sweat v. Dorris Cook

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6595 Document: 15

Date Filed: 11/30/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6595 REGINALD C. SWEAT, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. DORRIS COOK, Head Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity; HARRY MCKENN, Dr., Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (9:09-cv-01255-HFF) Submitted: November 18, 2010 AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and November 30, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior

Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald C. Sweat, Appellant Pro Se. Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees. James E. Parham, Jr.,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6595 Document: 15

Date Filed: 11/30/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. record and find no reversible error. the reasons stated by the district We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for court. Sweat v. Cook,

No. 9:09-cv-01255-HFF (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2010). motion to appoint counsel and dispense with

We deny Sweat's oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2