US v. William Handy, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:04-cr-00559-AW-7,8:09-cv-02011-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998417199] [10-6607]

Download PDF
US v. William Handy, Jr. Doc. 0 Case: 10-6607 Document: 7 Date Filed: 09/02/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6607 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. WILLIAM L. HANDY, JR., a/k/a B, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:04-cr-00559-AW-7; 8:09-cv-02011-AW) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William L. Handy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Bryan E. Foreman, Robert K. Hur, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland; Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6607 Document: 7 Date Filed: 09/02/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: William L. Handy, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his "Motion Requesting Release on Bail Pending Resolution of Petitioner's 28 U.S.C.[A.] 2255 [(West Supp. 2010)] Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3143(b) [(2006)] and the Court's Inherent Power." court recently the denied Our review reveals that the district Handy's seeks 2255 is no motion. longer Accordingly, available, we because relief Handy dismiss his appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?