US v. Abdul Sayfuallah

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:07-cr-01354-GRA-1,8:09-cv-70089-GRA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998376412] [10-6625]

US v. Abdul Sayfuallah

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6625 Document: 7

Date Filed: 07/09/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6625 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ABDUL AL BASEER SAYFUALLAH, a/k/a Bear, a/k/a Randel Noel Morris, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:07-cr-01354-GRA-1; 8:09-cv-70089-GRA) Submitted: June 28, 2010 Decided: July 9, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abdul Al Baseer Sayfuallah, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6625 Document: 7

Date Filed: 07/09/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Abdul district pursuant court's to 28 Al Baseer Sayfuallah relief (West motion seeks on to appeal motion the filed the

order U.S.C.A.

denying § 2255 first

his

Supp. to

2010),

and

court's order period.

denying

his

extend

the

appeal

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. When the United States or its officer or agency is a

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case "[T]he is a

jurisdictional requirement." 214 (2007).

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205,

The district court's order denying § 2255 relief was entered on the docket on November 20, 2009. Despite the fact

that Sayfuallah dated his notice of appeal January 18, 2010, we conclude that the earliest date on which he could have handed it to prison officials for mailing was March 1, 2010, the date appearing on a letter he attached to the notice of appeal. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). See

Thus, Sayfuallah

filed his notice of appeal outside the sixty-day appeal period.

2

Case: 10-6625 Document: 7

Date Filed: 07/09/2010

Page: 3

With regard to the court's order denying his motion to extend the appeal period, the district court entered its order on February 2, 2010. Sayfuallah did not file an amended notice He did, however, mention the

of appeal to include that order.

February 2 order in his informal brief, but the informal brief was filed outside the sixty-day appeal period. See Smith v.

Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 245 (1992) (holding that document filed within appeal period and containing information required by Fed. R. App. P. 3(c), is functional equivalent of notice of appeal). Because Sayfuallah failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3