Nathaniel Green v. State of South Carolina


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:10-cv-00396-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998414103] [10-6627]

Download PDF
Nathaniel Green v. State of South Carolina Doc. 0 Case: 10-6627 Document: 10 Date Filed: 08/30/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6627 NATHANIEL HAROLD GREEN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF BERKELEY; FAMILY COURT; PAUL LABARRON; SANDY HOLLAND; JACK A. LANDIS; WAYNE M. CREECH; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (6:10-cv-00396-TLW) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Harold Green, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6627 Document: 10 Date Filed: 08/30/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Harold Green appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated See Green v. South Carolina, No. 6:1030, 2010). We dispense with oral by the district court. cv-00396-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?