Vincent Missouri v. United States of America

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:09-cv-03269-CMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998471211] [10-6630]

Vincent Missouri v. United States of America

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6630 Document: 17

Date Filed: 11/23/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6630 VINCENT MISSOURI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MARK C. MOORE; DEBORAH B. BARBIER, Assistant US Attorney; UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT; DICKIE BRUNSON, Chief US Probation Officer; MYRA E. BAILEY, Supervising US Probation Officer; EARL GILLAM, US Probation Officer; US FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE; UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE, Greenville Division; GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINA SHERIFFS OFFICE, STATE OF; JUSTIN HUGHES, Officer, all Defendants officially and individually; HONORABLE MARGARET B. SEYMOUR; US BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNICOR PRISON INDUSTRY; DAVID PLOWDEN; CATHERINE E. EVATT; UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE, Columbia Division, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (2:09-cv-03269-CMC) Submitted: November 10, 2010 GREGORY, Decided: Circuit November 23, 2010 and HAMILTON,

Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge.

Judges,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6630 Document: 17

Date Filed: 11/23/2010

Page: 2

Vincent Missouri, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Case: 10-6630 Document: 17

Date Filed: 11/23/2010

Page: 3

PER CURIAM: Vincent denying his Missouri Rule appeals of Civil the district court's order to

Federal

Procedure

59(e)

motion

alter or amend judgment. no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons Missouri v. United States, No. 30, 2010). To the extent

stated by the district court. 2:09-cv-03269-CMC (D.S.C. Apr.

Missouri requests in his informal brief to waive the appellate case filing fee and to amend his complaint, we deny those

requests. legal before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

contentions the court

would

process. AFFIRMED

3