Stephen Yagman v. Tracy John

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:08-ct-03089-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998438852] [10-6633]

Download PDF
Stephen Yagman v. Tracy John Doc. 0 Case: 10-6633 Document: 20 Date Filed: 10/05/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6633 STEPHEN YAGMAN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. TRACY JOHNS; ARTHUR BEELER; HARLEY LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; KERRY MOTTERN; MITCHELL SPRINKLE; DERICK PHILLIPS, Defendants Appellees, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON OFFICERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03089-FL) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 5, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen Yagman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6633 Document: 20 Date Filed: 10/05/2010 Page: 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Case: 10-6633 Document: 20 Date Filed: 10/05/2010 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: Stephen Yagman appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Yagman v. Johns, No. 5:08-ct-03089-FL (E.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the district court. Mar. 29, 2010). facts and legal before materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?