US v. Steve Dia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998398257] [10-6637]

Case: 10-6637

Document: 5

Date Filed: 08/09/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6637 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff ­ Appellee, v. STEVE DIAS, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a O'Neil Guthrie, Defendant ­ Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steve Dias, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Case: 10-6637

Document: 5

Date Filed: 08/09/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Steve Dias appeals the district court's order denying his second 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Dias, No.

3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2010); see also United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-46 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacked authority to grant defendant's motion to reconsider, filed eight months after the district court's order ruling on original § 3582(c)(2) motion). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before We dispense with contentions the court are and

adequately

presented

materials

argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2