US v. Jessie Scott
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:04-cr-00453-TSE-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998418271] [10-6647]
<![CDATA[
US v. Jessie Scott
Doc. 0
Case: 10-6647 Document: 14
Date Filed: 09/03/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6647 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JESSIE SCOTT, a/k/a Jay Scott, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:04-cr-00453-TSE-1) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jessie Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-6647 Document: 14
Date Filed: 09/03/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Jessie Scott appeals the district court's order
denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). have reviewed the record and find no reversible We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Scott, No. 1:04-cr-00453-TSE-1 We
(E.D. Va. filed Apr. 19, 2010 & entered Apr. 20, 2010). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
