Clinton Ivey v. Garrett Shelton, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00374-GBL-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998418335] [10-6690]

Download PDF
Clinton Ivey v. Garrett Shelton, Jr. Doc. 0 Case: 10-6690 Document: 10 Date Filed: 09/03/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6690 CLINTON MATTHEW IVEY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GARRETT SHELTON, JR., Captain (Portsmouth Police); LISA SMITH, Lieutenant (Portsmouth Police); CARLOS GONZALEZ, Detective (Suffolk); PAM KING, Fire Marshal (Suffolk); WESTBROOK PARKER, Judge; JUSTIN T. BUSH, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00374-GBL-TCB) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Matthew Ivey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6690 Document: 10 Date Filed: 09/03/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Clinton order action. dismissing Matthew his 42 Ivey U.S.C. appeals 1983 the district civil court's rights (2006) On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). not challenge Ivey has the basis Because for the in the Appellant's brief. Ivey's informal court's the brief does district review district of disposition, order. forfeited we appellate affirm the court's Accordingly, dispense with court's judgment. We oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?