Winfred Witherspoon v. Booth


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01593-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998438898] [10-6703]

Download PDF
Winfred Witherspoon v. Booth Doc. 0 Case: 10-6703 Document: 11 Date Filed: 10/05/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6703 WINFRED WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. BOOTH, individually and in his or her official capacity, Psych. Assoc., Mrs.; JEREMY SOWERS, individually and in his or her official capacity; SHERRY HAFERKAMP, individually and in his or her official capacity; STATE OF MARYLAND, individually and in his or her own capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01593-JFM) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 5, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Winfred Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholé Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6703 Document: 11 Date Filed: 10/05/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Winfred Witherspoon appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witherspoon v. Booth, No. 1:09-cv-01593-JFM (D. Md. May 6, 2010). We also grant Appellees' motion to waive personal service and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?