US v. Anthony McClelland

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998348962-2]; denying Motion to produce 21 U.S.C. 851 (2006) notice [998390786-2]. Originating case number: 5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-13. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998418276] [10-6711]

Download PDF
US v. Anthony McClelland Doc. 0 Case: 10-6711 Document: 11 Date Filed: 09/03/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6711 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTHONY DEWAYNE MCCLELLAND, a/k/a Ant, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-13) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Dewayne McClelland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6711 Document: 11 Date Filed: 09/03/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Dewayne McClelland appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClelland, 2010). We No. deny 5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-13 McClelland's motion to See United States v. (W.D.N.C. appoint Apr. 29, and counsel motion to produce 21 U.S.C. 851 (2006) notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?