US v. David Hill


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for hearing en banc (FRAP 35) [998437510-2] Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998450191] [10-6754]

Download PDF
US v. David Hill Doc. 0 Case: 10-6754 Document: 12 Date Filed: 10/21/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6754 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID HILL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 21, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Dabney P. Langhorne, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6754 Document: 12 Date Filed: 10/21/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: David Hill appeals the district court's order denying his motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for See United States v. Further, the reasons stated by the district court. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. May 5, 2010). we deny Hill's motion for an en banc hearing. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before We dispense with contentions the court are and adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?