US v. Edwin Reye

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998363532-2]. Originating case number: 8:01-cr-00533-PJM-20. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998474257] [10-6760]

Download PDF
US v. Edwin Reye Doc. 0 Case: 10-6760 Document: 14 Date Filed: 11/30/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6760 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDWIN ARNOLDO REYES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:01-cr-00533-PJM-20) Submitted: November 18, 2010 AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and November 30, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edwin Arnoldo Reyes, Appellant Pro Assistant United States Attorney, Appellee. Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6760 Document: 14 Date Filed: 11/30/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Edwin Arnoldo Reyes appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to construe his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006) motion as a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. In his informal brief, Reyes challenges an earlier order denying his 3582 motion. Assuming that Reyes has properly appealed this order, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mar. 8, United States v. Reyes, No. 8:01-cr-00533-PJM-20 (D. Md. 2010). We deny Reyes' motion for appointment of counsel. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional contentions the court would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?