Clayton Brown v. R. Mathena

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998418296] [10-6772]

Download PDF
Clayton Brown v. R. Mathena Doc. 0 Case: 10-6772 Document: 9 Date Filed: 09/03/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6772 CLAYTON BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. C. MATHENA, Warden; OFFICER MITCHELL; SERGEANT SHRIEVE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clayton Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6772 Document: 9 Date Filed: 09/03/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Clayton Brown appeals the district court's order We denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Mathena, No. 7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the facts May 14, 2010). and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?