Rashid Al-Amin v. Gene Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:04-cv-00346-RAJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998474270] [10-6786]

Rashid Al-Amin v. Gene Johnson

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6786 Document: 15

Date Filed: 11/30/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6786 RASHID QAWI AL-AMIN, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, in his official capacity; LINDA SHEAR, in her individual and official capacities; RUFUS FLEMING, in his individual and official capacities; G. P. WILLIAMS, in his individual and official capacities; S. J. ADVENT, in his individual and official capacities; S. BAYLOR, in his individual and official capacities; D. M. FERGUSON, in his/her individual and official capacities; M. L. POPE, in his individual and official capacities; MR. FERROW, in his individual and official capacities; CHARLIE DAVIS, in his individual and official capacities; BLAINE BROCK, Food Service Manager, an employee of Compass Group USA, Inc. d/b/a Canteen Correctional Services; CLYDE ALDERMAN, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:04-cv-00346-RAJ) Submitted: November 18, 2010 AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and November 30, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior

Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6786 Document: 15

Date Filed: 11/30/2010

Page: 2

Rashid Qawi Al-Amin, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Paul Graham Beers, GLENN, FELDMANN, DARBY & GOODLATTE, Roanoke, Virginia; Peter M. Coppinger, Gregory D. Cote, MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Case: 10-6786 Document: 15

Date Filed: 11/30/2010

Page: 3

PER CURIAM: Rashid Qawi Al-Amin seeks to appeal the district This 28

court's order dismissing one of the defendants as a party. court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders,

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The

order Al-Amin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before Accordingly, we We dispense with contentions the court are and

adequately

presented

materials

argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

3