US v. Eduardo Martinez-Bautista


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00503-RLW-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998482175] [10-6819]

Download PDF
US v. Eduardo Martinez-Bautista Doc. 0 Case: 10-6819 Document: 7 Date Filed: 12/09/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6819 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDUARDO MARTINEZ-BAUTISTA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00503-RLW-1) Submitted: November 17, 2010 KEENAN, Decided: Circuit Judges, December 9, 2010 and HAMILTON, Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eduardo Martinez-Bautista, Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6819 Document: 7 Date Filed: 12/09/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Eduardo Martinez-Bautista appeals the district court's order denying his motion We claims, seeking have and consent reviewed find no for the a stipulated record and deportation order. Martinez-Bautista's reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martinez-Bautista, No. 3:05-cr-00503- RLW-1 (E.D. Va. May 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?