US v. Michael Oxendine
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:04-cr-00811-TLW-5. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998455000] [10-6864]
US v. Michael Oxendine
Doc. 0
Case: 10-6864 Document: 12
Date Filed: 10/28/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6864 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL OXENDINE, a/k/a Hollywood, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00811-TLW-5) Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 28, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Oxendine, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-6864 Document: 12
Date Filed: 10/28/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Michael Oxendine appeals the district court's order
denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). and find no reversible error. reasons stated by the We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the court. United States v. We legal
district
Oxendine, No. 4:04-cr-00811-TLW-5 (D.S.C. May 26, 2010). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?