Curtis Shuler v. Richard Neely

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00254-GCM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998451043] [10-6874]

Download PDF
Curtis Shuler v. Richard Neely Doc. 0 Case: 10-6874 Document: 10 Date Filed: 10/22/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6874 CURTIS SHULER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD NEELY, Superintendent of Lanesboro Correctional Institution; J. BENNETT, Superintendent of Lanesboro Correctional Institution; J. ATWATER, Mailroom Supervisor, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; STEVIE MILLER, Correctional Officer, Lanesboro Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00254-GCM) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 22, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Shuler, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6874 Document: 10 Date Filed: 10/22/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Curtis Shuler appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated See Shuler v. Neely, No. 3:10-cv-00254We dispense with oral argument by the district court. GCM (W.D.N.C. June 15, 2010). because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?