US v. William Cro

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998451030] [10-6882]

Download PDF
US v. William Cro Doc. 0 Case: 10-6882 Document: 6 Date Filed: 10/22/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6882 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 22, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Terrence Cross, Appellant Tayman, Assistant United States Virginia, for Appellee. Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Attorney, Newport News, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6882 Document: 6 Date Filed: 10/22/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: William Terrence Cross appeals the district court's order denying reconsideration of its previous motion order for a denying sentence Cross's 18 reduction. U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) The district court's order denying the reduction was On April 19, Cross filed a motion order, which the district court entered on April 13, 2010. for reconsideration of that denied. As the district court lacked the authority to grant reconsideration of its previous order, United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010), we affirm the district court's order denying reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?