US v. Victor Wright


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:06-cr-00038-DKC-1,8:08-cv-02830-DKC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998475578] [10-6914]

Download PDF
US v. Victor Wright Doc. 0 Case: 10-6914 Document: 14 Date Filed: 12/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6914 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VICTOR WARDELL WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:06-cr-00038-DKC-1; 8:08-cv-02830-DKC) Submitted: November 18, 2010 AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and December 1, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Wardell Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6914 Document: 14 Date Filed: 12/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Victor Wardell Wright appeals the district court's We order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(b) motion to amend. have reviewed we the record the and find no of reversible the district error. court. Accordingly, Wright v. affirm judgment Nos. United (D. Md. States, June 8:06-cr-00038-DKC-1, We dispense 8:08-cvwith oral 02830-DKC 16, 2010). argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?