Douglas Roseby v. Paul Budlow

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cv-00417-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998580994]. Mailed to: Douglas Roseby. [10-6937]

Appeal: 10-6937

Document: 17

Date Filed: 05/03/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6937

MR. DOUGLAS M. ROSEBY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MR. PAUL E. BUDLOW, et al.,
Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00417-AW)

Submitted:

April 14, 2011

Decided:

May 3, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas M. Roseby, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6937

Document: 17

Date Filed: 05/03/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Douglas M. Roseby appeals the district court’s order
dismissing

his

42

U.S.C.

§

1983

(2006)

complaint,

without

prejudice, as not cognizable under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S.
477 (1994).
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

See

Roseby v. Budlow, No. 8:10-cv-00417-AW (D. Md. Mar. 9, 2010).
We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2