Francisco Naranjo v. Cecilia Reynold

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cv-03238-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998454850] [10-6957]

Download PDF
Francisco Naranjo v. Cecilia Reynold Doc. 0 Case: 10-6957 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/28/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6957 FRANCISCO JAVIER NARANJO, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CECILIA REYNOLDS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (3:09-cv-03238-RBH) Submitted: October 20, 2010 Decided: October 28, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Francisco Javier Naranjo, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6957 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/28/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Francisco Javier Naranjo seeks to appeal the district court's order petition. We denying dismiss relief the on his 28 for U.S.C. lack of 2254 (2006) appeal jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court's order was entered on the docket on March 17, 2010. 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on July 9, Because Naranjo failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?