Larry Hamilton, Jr. v. Washington County Det Center

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal [998449657-2] Originating case number: 8:09-cv-00516-RWT,8:09-cv-00722-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998464342] [10-6970]

Download PDF
Larry Hamilton, Jr. v. Washington County Det Center Doc. 0 Case: 10-6970 Document: 12 Date Filed: 11/12/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6970 LARRY HAMILTON, JR., Plaintiff Appellant, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; VAN EVANS, Major; CICCARELLI, Dr.; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; O. WAYNE HILL, Warden; CARROLL PARRISH, Asst. Warden; O. WILLIAMS, R.N.; DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; PRIME MEDICAL CARE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-cv-00516-RWT; 8:09-cv-00722-RWT) Submitted: October 22, 2010 Decided: November 12, 2010 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Hamilton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rodger Owen Robertson, LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH M. JAGIELSKI, Baltimore, Maryland; David J. McManus, Jr., BAXTER, BAKER, SIDLE, CONN & JONES, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6970 Document: 12 Date Filed: 11/12/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Larry Hamilton, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. Appellee Evans has moved to dismiss, arguing Hamilton's notice of appeal was untimely. We deny Evans's motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm the district court's order. Cty. Det. Ctr., Nos. 8:09-cv-00516-RWT; Accordingly, Hamilton v. Washington 8:09-cv-00722-RWT (D. Md. May 26, 2010). facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the contentions the court materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?