US v. Darryl Riley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998386363-2] Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00101-RLW-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998549382]. [10-6974]

US v. Darryl Riley

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6974

Document: 30

Date Filed: 03/21/2011

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6974

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARRYL GLEN RILEY, a/k/a Kendu, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00101-RLW-1)

Submitted:

February 25, 2011

Decided:

March 21, 2011

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Amy L. Austin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Richard D. Cooke, John S. Davis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6974

Document: 30

Date Filed: 03/21/2011

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we deny Riley's motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr-00101We dispense with oral argument

RLW-1 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2010).

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2