Danny Conway v. Nancy Rouse

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00514-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998462365] [10-6996]

Download PDF
Danny Conway v. Nancy Rouse Doc. 0 Case: 10-6996 Document: 12 Date Filed: 11/09/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6996 DANNY CONWAY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. NANCY ROUSE; J. MICHAEL STOUFFEL; J. DIEHL; D. FORSHEY; R. MILLER; E. FISCHER; P. K. JACKSON, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00514-RDB) Submitted: October 29, 2010 Decided: November 9, 2010 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Conway, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6996 Document: 12 Date Filed: 11/09/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Danny Conway appeals the district court's order We denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conway v. We Rouse, dispense No. with are and 1:09-cv-00514-RDB oral argument (D. Md. the the the June 16, 2010). facts and legal before because in aid contentions the court adequately argument presented not materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?