Danny Conway v. Nancy Rouse

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00514-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998462365] [10-6996]

Danny Conway v. Nancy Rouse

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6996 Document: 12

Date Filed: 11/09/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6996 DANNY CONWAY, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. NANCY ROUSE; J. MICHAEL STOUFFEL; J. DIEHL; D. FORSHEY; R. MILLER; E. FISCHER; P. K. JACKSON, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00514-RDB) Submitted: October 29, 2010 Decided: November 9, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Conway, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6996 Document: 12

Date Filed: 11/09/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Danny Conway appeals the district court's order We

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conway v. We Rouse, dispense No. with are and 1:09-cv-00514-RDB oral argument (D. Md. the the the

June 16, 2010). facts and legal before

because in aid

contentions the court

adequately argument

presented not

materials

would

decisional process. AFFIRMED

2