US v. Timnah Rudisill
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00048-MR-9 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998443178] [10-7009]
<![CDATA[
US v. Timnah Rudisill
Doc. 0
Case: 10-7009 Document: 7
Date Filed: 10/12/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7009 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TIMNAH K. RUDISILL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:01-cr-00048-MR-9) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timnah K. Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-7009 Document: 7
Date Filed: 10/12/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Timnah K. Rudisill appeals the district court's order denying Release Claim." error. his Due "Emergency to Lack of Motion for Dismissal and and/or to Immediate State a
Jurisdiction
Failure
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the United States v. Rudisill, No. 1:01-cr-00048We dispense with oral argument
district court.
MR-9 (W.D.N.C. June 17, 2010).
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
