US v. Dejuan Watkin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:02-cr-00106-F-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998439963] [10-7039]
<![CDATA[
US v. Dejuan Watkin
Doc. 0
Case: 10-7039 Document: 7
Date Filed: 10/06/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7039 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DE'JUAN ANDERKO WATKINS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00106-F-1) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. De'Juan Anderko Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-7039 Document: 7
Date Filed: 10/06/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: De'Juan Anderko Watkins appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a writ of audita querela. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have
Accordingly, United 12,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. States 2010). legal before v. Watkins, No. 7:02-cr-00106-F-1 (E.D.N.C.
July
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
would
process. AFFIRMED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
