James Biggins v. Leah Seaton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cv-01488-PJM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998440051] [10-7040]

Download PDF
James Biggins v. Leah Seaton Doc. 0 Case: 10-7040 Document: 9 Date Filed: 10/06/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7040 JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEAH T. SEATON, Deputy District Public Defender, Public Defender; JOHN P. RUE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-01488-PJM) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Arthur Biggins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-7040 Document: 9 Date Filed: 10/06/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: James Arthur Biggins appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2006) and denying reconsideration. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, Biggins July 9, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. v. Seaton, No. 8:10-cv-01488-PJM (D. Md. June 11 & 2010). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?