James Biggins v. Leah Seaton
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cv-01488-PJM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998440051] [10-7040]
James Biggins v. Leah Seaton
Doc. 0
Case: 10-7040 Document: 9
Date Filed: 10/06/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7040 JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEAH T. SEATON, Deputy District Public Defender, Public Defender; JOHN P. RUE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-01488-PJM) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Arthur Biggins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-7040 Document: 9
Date Filed: 10/06/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: James Arthur Biggins appeals the district court's
orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying reconsideration. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have
Accordingly, Biggins July 9,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. v. Seaton, No. 8:10-cv-01488-PJM (D. Md. June 11 &
2010). legal before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
would
process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?