US v. Albert Betemit

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:95-cr-00064-REP-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998475689] [10-7048]

Download PDF
US v. Albert Betemit Doc. 0 Case: 10-7048 Document: 14 Date Filed: 12/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7048 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALBERT BETEMIT, a/k/a Juan Lopez, a/k/a Jose Ivan Torres, a/k/a Jose Frias, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:95-cr-00064-REP-1) Submitted: November 18, 2010 AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and December 1, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert Betemit, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-7048 Document: 14 Date Filed: 12/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Albert Betemit appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). reversible error. by the district We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. United States v. Betemit, No. 3:95-cr-00064-REP-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2010). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before We dispense with contentions the court are and adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?