Viston Martin v. Sergeant Hatfield
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:10-cv-00262-jlk-mfu Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998454824] [10-7053]
Viston Martin v. Sergeant Hatfield
Doc. 0
Case: 10-7053 Document: 9
Date Filed: 10/28/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7053 VISTON SHYROCK MARTIN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SERGEANT HATFIELD; T. LOWE, IHO; SERGEANT OWENS; RANDY C. MATHENA, Warden, Defendants Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00262-jlk-mfu) Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 28, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Viston Shyrock Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-7053 Document: 9
Date Filed: 10/28/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Viston Shyrock Martin appeals the district court's
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006). have reviewed the record and find no reversible We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Hatfield, No. 7:10-cv-00262-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
July 23, 2010). facts and legal before
materials
would
decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?