Lloyd Maxwell v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01483-BEL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998443216] [10-7098]

Download PDF
Lloyd Maxwell v. US Doc. 0 Case: 10-7098 Document: 13 Date Filed: 10/12/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7098 LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, Plaintiff Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01483-BEL) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-7098 Document: 13 Date Filed: 10/12/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346 (2006), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Maxwell v. United States, No. 1:10-cv-01483-BEL We dispense with oral argument because district court. (D. Md. June 30, 2010). the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?