Unula Abebe v. SC Dept of Correction


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:09-cv-03111-MBS-PJG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998443151] [10-7114]

Download PDF
Unula Abebe v. SC Dept of Correction Doc. 0 Case: 10-7114 Document: 15 Date Filed: 10/12/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7114 UNULA BOO SHAWN ABEBE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS; OFFICER GOFFREY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:09-cv-03111-MBS-PJG) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unula Boo Shawn Abebe, Appellant Pro Se. John Betts McCutcheon, Jr., Lisa Arlene Thomas, THOMPSON & HENRY, PA, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-7114 Document: 15 Date Filed: 10/12/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Unula Abebe seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the motion to dismiss filed by defendant South Carolina Department of Corrections, but rejecting the recommendation and granting Abebe leave to file his "Second Party Complaint" and recommitting consideration. his case to the magistrate judge for further This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). order nor The order Abebe seeks to appeal is neither a final an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?