US v. Norman Dai


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [998424426-2] Originating case number: 4:03-cr-00386-TLW-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998440182] [10-7124]

Download PDF
US v. Norman Dai Doc. 0 Case: 10-7124 Document: 14 Date Filed: 10/06/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7124 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NORMAN TYRONE DAIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Florence, at District of South Carolina. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00386-TLW-1) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman Tyrone Dais, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-7124 Document: 14 Date Filed: 10/06/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Norman Tyrone Dais appeals the district court's order denying his motion for production of documents for his inspection. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible we affirm. Dais has not given any Accordingly, substantial reason for granting the request. motion for an expedited appeal. We also deny his We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?