US v. Norman Dai
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [998424426-2] Originating case number: 4:03-cr-00386-TLW-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998440182] [10-7124]
US v. Norman Dai
Doc. 0
Case: 10-7124 Document: 14
Date Filed: 10/06/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7124 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NORMAN TYRONE DAIS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Florence, at District of South Carolina. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00386-TLW-1) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman Tyrone Dais, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-7124 Document: 14
Date Filed: 10/06/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Norman Tyrone Dais appeals the district court's order denying his motion for production of documents for his
inspection. error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible we affirm. Dais has not given any
Accordingly,
substantial reason for granting the request. motion for an expedited appeal.
We also deny his
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?