Juan Ocon-Parada v. S. Young


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cv-00087-MHL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998451976] [10-7142]

Download PDF
Juan Ocon-Parada v. S. Young Doc. 0 Case: 10-7142 Document: 7 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7142 JUAN CARLOS OCON-PARADA, a/k/a Juan Carlos Ocan-Parada, Petitioner Appellant, v. S. K. YOUNG, Warden, Respondent Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:09-cv-00087-MHL) Submitted: October 18, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010 Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan Carlos Ocon-Parada, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Theresa Armstrong, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-7142 Document: 7 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Juan Carlos Ocon-Parada seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2006) petition. or judge The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1) (2006). issue absent "a A certificate of appealability will not showing of the denial of a substantial constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 529 U.S. at 484-85. and conclude that Slack, We have independently reviewed the record Ocon-Parada has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability We dispense with oral argument because and dismiss the appeal. the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 2 Case: 10-7142 Document: 7 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?