Ernest Battle v. Warden Bodison
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-02038-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998535820] [10-7312]
Ernest Battle v. Warden Bodison
Doc. 0
Case: 10-7312
Document: 15
Date Filed: 03/02/2011
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7312
ERNEST BATTLE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN M. BODISON, Lieber Correctional Inst., Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-02038-JFA)
Submitted:
February 24, 2011
Decided:
March 2, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-7312
Document: 15
Date Filed: 03/02/2011
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Ernest Battle seeks to appeal the district court's
orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or The judge
issues a certificate of appealability. (2006).
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). relief on the merits, that a When the district court denies satisfies would this standard that claims 473, by the is 484
prisoner
demonstrating district debatable
reasonable of v.
jurists the
find
court's or
assessment Slack
constitutional 529 U.S.
wrong.
McDaniel,
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. at 484-85. that We have independently has not made reviewed the Slack, 529 U.S. the record and
conclude
Battle
requisite
showing.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
2
Case: 10-7312
Document: 15
Date Filed: 03/02/2011
Page: 3
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process. DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?