US v. Jason Linder

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998561915].. [10-7313]

Download PDF
Case: 10-7313 Document: 7 Date Filed: 04/06/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7313 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JASON LANDIS LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5) Submitted: March 30, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011 Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason Landis Linder, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-7313 Document: 7 Date Filed: 04/06/2011 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Jason Landis Linder appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel reduction in his sentence. no reversible error. the Government to move for a We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Linder, No. 2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?