US v. Jason Linder
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998561915].. [10-7313]
Case: 10-7313
Document: 7
Date Filed: 04/06/2011
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7313
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JASON LANDIS LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5)
Submitted:
March 30, 2011
Decided:
April 6, 2011
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason Landis Linder, Appellant Pro Se.
Darryl James Mitchell,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Norfolk,
Virginia,
for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Case: 10-7313
Document: 7
Date Filed: 04/06/2011
Page: 2
PER CURIAM:
Jason Landis Linder appeals the district court’s order
denying
his
motion
to
compel
reduction in his sentence.
no reversible error.
the
Government
to
move
for
a
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
See United States v. Linder, No.
2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2010).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?